HIPAA Compliance - The Stakes Are Getting Higher

Is managing your release of information requeststhe envelope is still sealed and does not appear to
worth the risk?have been opened.
As a practice owner or administrator, you don't4. His records were faxed to the coffee house
need reminding that operating a HIPAA-compliantand Mr. Smith graciously went to the coffee
practice is crucial-and becoming more difficult ashouse and retrieved them (and enjoyed a
the rules and penalties become tighter and morecomplimentary cup of coffee on you). No
progressive. With "mile markers" from thenotification is required if you can document in your
HITECH act becoming enforceable, this article wasinternal HIPAA compliant documentation protocols
written to educate readers by outlining details ofthat you followed proper protocols to immediately
exactly how to determine if breach notification ismitigate harm, including securing a signed
necessary and examining a major change to theconfidentiality agreement from the coffee house
Covered Entity (CE) and Business Associate (BA)recipient.
relationship. The content also provides tried and5. Mr. Smith receives his record as intended, and
true best practices and ways to mitigate the risktwo months later, he arrives in your office with a
and liability introduced by the new regulations.page of medical records belonging to another
Much like using an accountant for your income taxpatient. On the record is a name but no other
filing, using a reputable BA for outsourced servicespiece of Protected Health Information (PHI). No
may provide protection, peace of mind andnotification is required - only two pieces of PHI
potential savings.together could lead an individual to be able to
Focusing on changes to the day-to-day officeprovide harm to the identity.
workflow.The new paradigm-ways to mitigate risk and best
The effects of the changes rolled out in thepractice tips.
HITECH Act are widespread and will impact manyIt is easy to understand why these new
(if not all) facets of HIPAA compliance. This articleregulations and associated penalties have left
places the laser-focus on how the changes willmany practices stumped and wondering, "What
affect the covered entity in their day-to-daycan I do to avoid these expensive and
office activities that involve sensitive informationtime-consuming breaches besides turn my office
as opposed to ill-intent or malicious breaches.into a 'patient-free' practice?" There are several
To notify or not? The tale of two Mr. Smiths.scenarios to consider, and thankfully none include
To really understand these changes, it is easiestbanning patients!
to think about a real-world scenario. We will lookThe first route is possibly the most
at three examples of wrongful disclosure ofobvious--continuous and rigorous training of
information, and determine if they are a breachemployees on the new HIPAA rules and changes.
for which you must follow the notificationIn addition to training, implementing workflow
protocols.processes and checks and balances in regard to
Example 1: John Smith, Sr., was born in 1947 andrecord-keeping fulfillment can help reduce the
his son, John Smith, Jr., was born in 1974. Thenumber of office-related errors. A well
father, Mr. Smith Sr., requested a copy of hisdocumented current HIPAA Compliant Security
medical record be mailed to himself. When theand Privacy Protocol will help streamline the entire
records arrived, they were that of his son Johnprocess if a breach or violation does occur and
Smith, Jr. He immediately called your practicenotification determination steps are necessary.
because he is still in need of his information. YouFinally, a practice may want to consider placing
must then determine is this a breach for whichaccountability on the personnel involved. As one
notification action is required:might imagine, while these initiatives may reduce
• Question One: Was the protected healththe number of errors, this extra training and
information secure? In this situation, the answer is,workflow management comes at a cost of its
"No." By HIPAA definition, secure meansown in terms of personnel and executive
encrypted or destroyed. These files were loosemanagement resources. If an office is
paper records in a mailing envelope.experiencing high rates of employee turnover, the
• Question Two: Do any of the exclusionstask of HIPAA compliance training could very
apply? (See Appendix A.) No, none of theeasily become a full-time job.
exclusions apply.What is another solution? Transfer the liability.
• Question Three: Is there significant risk ofThe HITECH Act updated HIPAA to include the
financial, reputational, or other harm to thePrivacy and Security Provisions which now affect
individual that was wrongfully disclosed? In thisBusiness Associates. Civil and criminal penalties
example, one would hope the answer is, "NO"!apply directly to the Business Associate. The
(After all, it is his son.) However, as we know ansignificance of this change in the law is that you
estranged relationship or sensitive information incan transfer the liability of a breach onto the BA
the file, could be a problem. With verbalrather than shouldering the burden yourself.
confirmation and a documented historical trail, youGiven the onerous nature of compliance, it could
could confirm with Mr. Smith, Sr., to please eithermake sense for you to let someone else assume
hand over the record to his son or appropriatelythe risk of Mr. Smith's information landing in the
destroy them. (Note - Mr. Smith Sr. may bewrong place. What's more, in shifting the
unaware of the risk he poses for his son if heresponsibility onto the BA, you can outsource all
simply throws the record in the trash, or evenof the analysis, consideration and documentation in
worse, leaves them in his curbside recycle bin. Itthe event of a breach along with the required
is crucial to define a script and policy for exactlyinternal audit to review each and every
what your staff should say to Mr. Smith, Sr., toopportunity for PHI information to travel outside
ensure no further disclosure of the information.)your practice.
Therefore, it could be determined that this is notIn the medical records department it certainly
a breach and you would not be required to followseems a logical fit to transfer this liability. You can
the notification protocol. However, you mustreduce the statistical chances of your practice
document what happened and why/how youincurring a penalty or violation or worse--a full
have determined it is not a breach. It would alsoblown breach requiring notification--by simply
certainly be a good PR/Customer Service movereducing the number of opportunities for your
to contact Mr. Smith, Jr. and assure him of yourmedical records department to have to distribute
protocols to protect his information, because it isinformation. In short, let a trusted service provider
highly likely that his father will alert him to thissuch as DataFile Technologies do this for you.
mistake.Consider Business Associates such as DataFile
Example 2: Let's alter the above example slightlyTechnologies that specialize in working with
and assume that Mr. Smith, Sr., did request hispractices that have converted to an Electronic
information, but provided you a fax number toMedical Record (EMR) system. In a digital
expedite his receipt of the records. In thisenvironment, these companies can become a fully
scenario, the number is most likely notfunctional outsourced medical records department
programmed into your pre-programmed databasefor your practice. At a minimum, they handle the
of frequently used fax numbers so it would needmajority of the distribution of PHI allowing clients
to be hand-keyed. The numbers were accidentallyto minimize the possibility or even eliminate the
transposed and your office receives a phone callabove example of breach from occurring.
from a local coffee house that they haveIn making the case for outsourcing to a BA,
received the information on their fax. If you canreducing your risk and shifting the liability from
show there is no significant risk of financial,you, the Covered Entity, might be the most
reputational, or other harm to the individual, noobvious selling point, but the benefits extend far
notification will be required.beyond to include the following:
HHS has given guidance for helping you define the• Workload redistribution/natural attrition. While
term, "significant risk" (See Appendix B):your practice may be perfectly satisfied with the
• Question One: Did the information go toperformance of the current fulfillment specialist, if
another Covered Entity? In this example, thehe/she moves, rehiring and retraining a new
answer is "No," because the coffee house is not aperson may not make sense given the new rules
Covered Entity.and regulations. The BA can function as an
• Question Two: Were you able to takeextension of the fulfillment and record-keeping
immediate steps to mitigate the harm includingdepartment.
return or destruction of the information AND a• Daily processing of records. Select a BA that
written confidentiality agreement? This area iscan process record requests very quickly as
ambiguous, and it would be wise to get counselopposed to an in-house model where fulfillment is
from your legal resource. If your staff memberrelegated as other priorities become more
who answered the call from the coffee shoppressing or a copy service model that processes
followed well-defined, documented guidelines,requests on specific days. Faster record fulfillment
including securing a signature on a writtenleads to better patient relationships and
confidentiality agreement, it could be determinedsatisfaction and ultimately, increased patient
during an audit that you proved no significant riskretention and word-of-mouth referrals.
for further disclosure or ill-intended use of the• Reduction of phone calls. Whether it is
information. If securing the written confidentialitypatients, underwriters or other practices, the
agreement proves to be unsuccessful, wordingrecord-keeping and fulfillment team fields tons of
such as "Do you agree that you will not furtherphone calls inquiring about the status of record
disclose this information and that you have norequests. By using the BA with rapid turnaround
intention of using any of the information thattimes, these calls are dramatically reduced, if not
would prove harmful to the patient?" and aeliminated entirely.
response from the coffee house manager "I• Liability risk reduction. More than simply
agree. I'm sitting next to my shredder and theshifting the compliance onus from your practice to
records are being shredded as we speak," maya BA, the risk reduction comes from choosing the
help protect your argument for NOT a breachright BA. For example, DataFile's data security,
and no notification required. Again, this is achain of custody protocols, and best practice
beautiful shade of "gray area" and professionalworkflow procedures ensure your patient's PHI is
HIPAA legal advice is always recommended. Whensafe.
in doubt, call it a breach and notify!• Elimination of staff training and retraining.
Therefore, in the above example, you would notKeeping your practice compliant and your staff
be required to follow the notification mandates.properly trained can be a major strain on
Example 3: Lastly, let's tweak the above exampleresources and time management. Conversely,
one last time and assume that Mr. Smith, Sr.,your outsourced employees are highly-reliable,
requested his information be faxed. However,technology savvy and well-versed in HIPAA
instead of a phone call from the gracious coffeecompliance and changes.
house manager, your office receives a phone callWith these points in mind, the overriding message
that is transferred into the medical recordsis clear - you can unburden yourself from the legal
voicemail from an individual that does not identifyrisks, resource strain and busywork of medical
themselves and leaves no additional contactrecords fulfillment by choosing a reputable partner.
information. You are unable to retrieve the phoneWith all of these compliance changes, the time is
number on caller ID, etc.right to remove a major burden from your
You are unable to confidently ensure that thepractice. Not only will you transfer liability, but you
information will be disposed of properly or thatwill also experience the time-savings and peace of
there is not a significant risk as defined. In thismind of working with a partner who has the
case, you will have to endure the cumbersomesingular goal of enabling your practice to focus on
burden of following your notification of breachyour patients.
protocol:Appendices
1. The patient must be notified with all of theAppendix A - Exclusions defined by HHS
proper notification criteria.1. Workforce Use - Unintentional acquisition, access
2. Your own internal documentation must beor use of PHI by a workforce member if the PHI
updated and filed properly.is not further used or disclosed in a manner that
3. You will need to complete an annual filing withviolates the Privacy Rule.
the US Department of Health and Human2. Workforce Disclosure - Unintentional disclosure
Services atof PHI by a workforce member to another
4. Your practice may be subject to a $100workforce member if the PHI is not further used
violation fee at the discretion of HHS and/or OCR.or disclosed in a manner that violates the Privacy
For clarity, the following are a few more quickRule.
examples:3. No Way to Retain Info - Unauthorized disclosure
1. Mr. Smith's records are faxed to anotherto which the CE or BA has a good faith belief
Covered Entity. No notification required.that the unauthorized person to whom the PHI is
2. His records were emailed to your attorney anddisclosed would not reasonably have been able to
they were meant to go to your outsourced billingretain info.
service. No notification is required because theAppendix B - Significant Risk Guideline by HHS
defined exclusions cover "Workforce" and a1. Covered Entity to Covered Entity - Inadvertent
contracted BA (the attorney and outsourced billingdisclosure of PHI from one CE or BA employee
service would both be considered workforce).to another similarly situated CE or BA employee,
Additionally, if you can determine that the email ofproved that PHI is not further used or disclosed in
the recipient was encrypted and of course yourany manner that violates the Privacy Rule.
company outgoing email is encrypted, then the2. Immediate Steps to Mitigate - Immediate steps
information is NOT unsecured information and noare taken to mitigate the harm including return or
notification required.destruction of the information or a written
3. His records were lost in the mail for twoconfidentiality agreement.
months and a beat up envelope arrives back to3. Types of Information Included - The
your practice with a "could not deliver" sticker. Noinformation disclosed was limited to just the name
notification is required if you can determine thatof the individual or a limited data set.