| s 25 years back when the first corporation | | | | price their offerings to such a degree that they |
| thought of this bright idea of farming out part of | | | | either go out of business or are forced to cut |
| its IT department to somebody else. They called | | | | back on service. Customers, who mistakenly think |
| it time-sharing, and it was supposed to cut costs | | | | that outsourcers are the experts in any |
| dramatically. These days, the hot money-saver is | | | | technology, often do not know how to protect |
| off-loading Internet-related functions to application | | | | themselves from bad deals. The importance of |
| service providers (ASPs) that rent out software | | | | Vendor Evaluation can not be overemphasized. |
| applications. Between the two, businesses | | | | When outsourcers began to offer the |
| experimented with giant agreements that saw | | | | maintenance of desktop PCs for the first time, a |
| entire technology operations shift to outside | | | | multitude of outsourcing companies sprang up to |
| companies. | | | | meet this demand. Eager for customers, they |
| No matter what the current term, the basic | | | | priced their services too low. A shakeout followed, |
| concept is outsourcing. And seeing as we've had a | | | | leaving only a handful of companies and a host of |
| quarter century to work out the kinks, one would | | | | dissatisfied customers. But as both customers and |
| think that by now it would be a trouble-free, | | | | vendors gained experience with how to best |
| fill-in-the-blanks process. | | | | structure desktop deals, satisfaction levels rose. |
| But that would be wrong. Outsourcing, it seems, is | | | | It is noticeable that so far, the ASP phenomenon |
| one place where it's a snap for history to repeat | | | | is following the same trajectory. A year or two |
| itself—with some calamitous results. While | | | | ago, new ASPs were appearing overnight. Today, |
| many companies have undoubtedly saved money, | | | | the ASP consolidation is well under way as both |
| several others have seen costs spiral, quality | | | | businesses and customers get smart about how |
| plummet or, worst of all, IT operations crash. | | | | to handle these new projects. In the meantime, |
| Why is it that this seemingly simple idea has | | | | mistakes happen. |
| spawned so many disaster stories? | | | | Given the high margin for error, why would |
| The plain truth is that outsourcers commonly | | | | anyone outsource a new technology? Simply put, |
| repeat a painful learning cycle every time a new | | | | you may have no other choice. Cycle times are |
| technology gets outsourced. Because it can take | | | | shorter than ever, money is tight and skilled |
| years for both outsourcers and their customers | | | | personnel are hard to find. For many companies, |
| to learn a technology and understand how best to | | | | outsourcing offers an attractive path around |
| manage it within the scope of the outsourcing | | | | these constraints. But regardless of why you |
| agreement, they often make mistakes that have | | | | outsource, mistakes happen—and often |
| long-term effects. For example, when technology | | | | enough for us to compile a list of five classic |
| is new—such as customer relationship | | | | outsourcing blunders. Here's hoping that you can |
| management and supply chain | | | | learn from a host of others' missteps. |
| management—outsourcers often under | | | | |