Fair Trade, Housing Boom Economics and Clear Cutting Timber in Canada

We have done so much here in the United Statesnot had cheaper timber, as cited in the
to make sure trees, which are cut down or areasProfessional Building Magazine in Sept. 2001. Now
of our forest, which are thinned out are done sothen it might have been even higher in the peak
responsibly. Our Timber industries are regulated,of the housing boom in 2004 and 2005. Some had
even over regulated as they are made to replantsaid in 2003 it was only 200,000 who would have
trees, re-grow forests and adhere to so manybeen unable to afford homes, but I disagree and
rules and the Canadians have not appeared tosee the number at about 200,000. Yet why
even be close to the same page.Indeed Canadashould young couples with only five percent down
does have more trees, but they do not havebe buying a home anyway? That is not fiscally
significantly faster growth, only slightly. If they doresponsible. And now as the housing boom is
not have the same environmental rules andended, we see the results with so many
regulations and they sell their timber cheaper thenforeclosures.Towards the end of the housing
out companies cannot compete. Meanwhile thebubble, many of these buyers were upside down
Canadians wreak there environment. Now thenin these homes almost as before the ink was dry.
from a home building standpoint cheaper lumberThey will not be able to sell due to the supply, so
helps homebuyers and construction costs which isused home sales are not as good or have as
good. I find that the prices of increased lumbergood of chance of re-financing. It seems so often
might cost first time homebuyers from qualifyinglittle issues affect bigger issues and that every
if the prices of Canadian lumber were equal to USthing is inter related and when you allow one
lumber. So there is definitely some room formisstep in one sector, it will affect another and
argument here.As many as a million homebuyersthus we often see in hindsight the law of
in the last housing boom just ended each yearunintended consequences and that today is my
may not have been able to buy homes had wemain point. Consider all this in 2006.